Introduction
TON blockchain has introduced Tolk as a modern alternative to FunC. This analysis compares the security implications of both languages for smart contract development.
Language Comparison
| Feature | FunC | Tolk |
|---|---|---|
Type Safety | Weak | Strong |
Memory Safety | Manual | Automatic |
Error Handling | Basic | Advanced |
Developer Experience | Low-level | High-level |
Security Implications
Tolk's improved type system catches many vulnerabilities at compile time that would only be discovered at runtime with FunC.
func_example.fc
;; FunC - Type confusion possible() recv_internal(slice in_msg_body) impure { int value = in_msg_body~load_uint(64); ;; No compile-time check if 64 bits is correct}Type Safety
Tolk prevents many common FunC vulnerabilities
Migration
Consider migrating existing FunC contracts
Audit Focus
FunC contracts need more rigorous auditing
